I'm not going to waste much time on this.
The article doesn't tell us any of them but I think we can work out which crops up the most. (1) rape (2) serious underage - eight year olds and (3) willing consensual sex with women between 17 and 22. Call me cynical but I don't think it's because it's so enormous. It is whether the sex lives of hundreds of law abiding, grown ups, many of whose sex-turn-ons may not be super mainstream should be curtailed significantly at the behest of a guy who can tell us that most of it isn't child rape but refuses point blank to say how big a problem these bad rape type videos are. The issue, incidentally, at least to me isn't whether you're allowed to rape people or whether you need the three bad guys names to help you with that. The guy is happy to tell us that most fall into the latter category - but unless he tells us whether that's most of 3 or most of 3000, it's all pretty meaningless. If anyone can't tell the difference between (a) the actual rape of an eight year old child and (b) consensual age of consent issues as they relate to 17 to 22 year olds they are on a different planet from me. Isn't the first question - ok, so how big a problem is this? How many videos a day? And in which category? I don't buy the "the issue is consent" stuff at all. Why doesn't he actually tell us the number he clearly knows? He has spoken to one of their review people.
980million why? I bet a search on Is the New York Times turning into the Daily Mail in competition for the daftest scare story? It would get quite a few answers too. It looks to me like bring in the bad guys and blame it on Pornhub.īack to the numbers - so the guy tells how many responses one gets to a text search. Nobody is saying rape is ok - and if the guy thinks we need those three bogeymen to tell us rape is bad, then he thinks we are very stupid indeed. Secondly, I'm sorry but suggesting that Weinstein, Epstein and Cosby are relevant because the issue is consent is the most absurd straw man (or 3 ever). Search "fuck" and see how many of each you see. To say "probably" seems at best over-cautious and at worst downright deceptive. What's his problem with numbers? I think we can probably agree that "most" videos on PornHub don't show any rape/child porn/age of consent issues. Why, hello folks.As he clearly has no niche sexual interests that have been over-regulated by Puritan moralists: he is a prude, and an ignorant one at that. You're on reddit, we're on reddit, you know that we know that you know that we know you're on reddit. That means you're reposting something we've already seen. If your post is from a FWP aggregator or feed, they got it from here in the first place. If you know it's a repost, everyone else knows it too. None of "this" or "every damn time" or "am I doing it right, reddit?" Also see rule #2.įull problem must be in the title.
Links must be directly related to the problem, and the content being linked must add value to the post. Then we'll feel guilty for having enough money to have the same problem. If it's a problem you can only have if you have money we'll feel bad for you.
Is the wireless internet you're stealing not very fast?ĭid you have to go extreme lengths to avoid talking to or meeting someone? Someone only give you a large shake, not a super-size? Is the air conditioning at work too cold during the summer and too hot during the winter?ĭoes your car's AUX input only allow for two devices?